FORECASTS & TRENDS E-LETTER
by Gary D. Halbert
January 3, 2023

IN THIS ISSUE:

1. Overview – Another New Year In The Markets

2. Ken Fisher’s Latest Market Outlook For 2023

3. Fisher Is Bullish On Stocks For The New Year

4. Thanks So Much For Your Loyalty & Feedback

Overview – Another New Year In The Markets

Well, here goes with another new year of writing my Forecasts & Trends newsletter, along with my other weekly column entitled Between The Lines. I don’t mention it very often but I have been writing Forecasts & Trends, or some previous iteration of it, since 1977. That’s 45 years! It sure doesn’t feel like I’ve been doing it that long, but when you’re enjoying it…

And I am still enjoying it. I thoroughly enjoy all the reading I have to do to gather information for these letters and deciding what topics to write about. It helps greatly that I am a professionally trained speed-reader, and I can read at roughly 10 times the speed of the average reader. As always, I highly recommend you take a speed-reading course!

As is usual for the week between Christmas and New Year’s, there has not been a lot going on in the markets or the economy. As a result, I have decided to reprint a column from Ken Fisher who is best known for his “Portfolio Strategies” columns which appeared in Forbes for over 30 years. Ken is the Founder and Executive Chairman of Fisher Investments, four times New York Times best-selling author, and a regular columnist in 17 countries globally.

Ken is quite bullish on the stock market for 2023, despite the losing year in 2022. He makes the case that 2023 could be a lot like 1967 when stocks rallied strongly after a losing year in 1966. Ken’s latest column comes at a time when most financial advisors believe we are in a bear market, and most investors think we will see a recession in 2023. So, I thought you might enjoy a different perspective to start the New Year. You may agree or disagree, but he always makes some interesting points.

“Why 2023 Will Be Like 1967’s ‘Summer of Love’ For The Stock Market
by Ken Fisher of Fisher Investments

Hot inflation and recession fears. Spiking interest rates from the Fed. Divisive US politics. A regional war overseas with global repercussions. I’m not talking about 2022 – I’m talking about 1966.

A familiar set of fears dogged stocks during the year that also gave us the Chevy Camaro, the NFL-AFL merger and “How the Grinch Stole Christmas.” But a year later, 1967 delivered not only the “Summer of Love,” but also a stunning rally for stocks as economic fears faded. This year has been uncannily 1966ish. Expect a startling, 1967-like bull market in the year ahead.

Markets always move most on surprises — gaps between expectations and what actually ends up happening. When political, cultural and economic fears are excessive, even minor positives provide powerful upside. Anything that’s less worse than feared triggers bullish relief. Bear markets build excessive pessimism naturally.

In 1966, the S&P 500 endured a minor bear market — a 22% rout that started in early January and bottomed in October (yes – just like 2022). The Vietnam War escalated. Major social and infrastructure legislation added to divisive midterm elections. Disdain for President ‘LBJ’ was different, but in many ways parallel, to sentiment among many voters for President ‘Brandon’. Inflation exploded. So the Fed hiked short-term interest rates – less than now – but by historical standards significantly, steadily and scarily.

Recession fears reigned. Bears like to talk about “capitulation” — that panicky, violent, cascading selloff that typically ends bear markets. They liked to talk about it in 1966, too. But capitulation never came. Instead, October began a new bull market, with stocks rising just like they rose this quarter. After a stealthily positive 6% fourth quarter, stocks soared 24% in 1967.

Sentiment in 2022 was – and still is – not good when it comes to stocks. Virtually all surveys show dourness, like the American Association of Individual Investors’ retail investor gauge. The University of Michigan’s Consumer Sentiment survey hovers near all-time record lows — which only happens when higher prices are looming. A 2023 recession is overwhelmingly expected. Fully 68% of respondents in Bank of America’s Global Fund Manager Survey expect one.

Reality is brighter. A large minority expected we were in a recession last quarter, too. But US third quarter GDP grew a surprisingly strong 3.2% annualized, reversing two quarterly declines (skewed by inventory change and imports). Almost all other major nations saw positive, improved GDP growth.

Nevertheless, the recession expectation consensus grew anyway. This, mind you, wasn’t an altogether bad thing. The longer firms expect recession, the more they prepare. Companies have spent this year cutting inventories and pruning headcounts. As a result, a recession has become less likely, and if it does come, it will be milder than it would have been otherwise. Forewarning is mitigation.

Likewise, the CEOs of almost every big bank – from Jamie Dimon to Jane Fraser — have openly, long and often, trashed the US economy and predicted a recession. But recessions always bring savagely rising default rates on their loans, pummeling earnings. If these bankers were truly fearful of defaults, these bankers presumably would have already scuttled their lending.

They haven’t. As I noted in this column Dec. 13, November’s US loan growth hit 11.8% year-over-year, accelerating from year-end 2021’s 4.0%, showing monthly growth that’s notably inconsistent with looming recession. Ditto for global loan growth, which has grown every month since March.

Got your head scratching? Watch what banks do, not what they say. What they say is sentiment. What they do is reality.

And the Fed hikes? Everyone thinks those kill the economy. Usually, they do. But every time they spiked rates this year, loan growth galloped faster. Why? Because banks’ future lending profitability rises now with rate hikes. And when they lend, the borrowers spend. They don’t sit on it. Historically, bank lending costs usually paralleled the bank overnight borrowing cost controlled by the Fed. Not now, as I have also noted here on Dec. 13.

For that reason, today’s much ballyhooed “inverted yield curve” fears — 3-month Treasury yields exceeding 10-year rates — are overblown. In September 1966, the Fed also inverted the yield curve. Yet the bulk of the inversion came later, after stocks bottomed, like this time. And no recession struck.

Politics? Like 1966, 2022 was a midterm election year. As I detailed in this column Nov. 16, midterms create stock market rocket fuel — averaging 18%-plus returns during the third years of US presidents’ terms. They have been stronger still, averaging 28%, when the second year was negative, like 2022 and 1966 were. Stocks surged 24% in 1967.

Unlike 1967, 2023 bond returns should flow positive, reversing 2022 as 2023 inflation risk falls, as I also have noted in this column. Long-term interest rates will price that lower risk.

Despite all of this, I hear what you’re saying: 2022 hasn’t been pretty. Pessimism feels like a safe, comfortable bet. But maybe it’s also possible that folks have been bracing for the worst long enough.

As we ring in the New Year, I would suggest we instead brace for a pleasant surprise. I can’t promise another “Summer of Love” for 2023 when it comes to sex, drugs or rock ‘n’ roll. But I do believe the New Year will deliver a surprisingly strong stock market globally.” [Emphasis added GDH.]

END QUOTE

Thanks So Much For Your Loyalty & Feedback

As we begin a New Year, let me tell you once again how much I appreciate your continued loyalty and reading me for all these years. We have thousands of subscribers all across the country, most of whom I have never met or even spoken to. But that doesn’t mean I don’t feel a connection with every one of you.

Most of my subscribers have been reading me for a very long time, and I can’t tell you how much that means to me. It keeps me motivated to do my reading and bring you what I feel are the most interesting and helpful columns I can write. It’s a real challenge, but as stated at the beginning above, I still really enjoy it and hope to continue for at least several more years.

As always, I very much appreciate all of your feedback, positive or negative. While I can’t respond to all of your comments, I do read each and every one. Your feedback helps me make this a better letter each week. So, please keep your comments coming – the more the better – and know that I appreciate them whether you agree with me or not.

As we enter a new year, I’ll keep trying my best to bring you information and opinions that are interesting and will make you think. And I encourage you to give me your feedback and know that I will continue to read every comment you send in.

I appreciate each and every one of my readers more than you can know!

Thank you & best personal regards,

Gary D. Halbert

Gary's Between the Lines column:
Holiday Sales Rose 7.6%, Better Than Expected

 

Forecasts & Trends E-Letter is published by Halbert Wealth Management, Inc., a Registered Investment Adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. Information contained herein is taken from sources believed to be reliable but cannot be guaranteed as to its accuracy. Opinions and recommendations herein generally reflect the judgement of the named author and may change at any time without written notice. Market opinions contained herein are intended as general observations and are not intended as specific advice. Readers are urged to check with their financial counselors before making any decisions. This does not constitute an offer of sale of any securities. Halbert Wealth Management, Inc., and its affiliated companies, its officers, directors and/or employees may or may not have their own money in markets or programs mentioned herein. Past results are not necessarily indicative of future results. All investments have a risk of loss. Be sure to read all offering materials and disclosures before making a decision to invest. Reprinting for family or friends is allowed with proper credit. However, republishing (written or electronically) in its entirety or through the use of extensive quotes is prohibited without prior written consent.